This item on SpicyIP last week has got me asking questions in the office. My questions are: are agricultural products considered “technologies” in the case of climate change? How did the UNFCCC intend to assist developing countries with the financial burden of TT when they rolled this plan out? What impact could this further talk of compulsory licences for technologies that “combat climate change” have on other situations? If compulsory licences are deemed appropriate for climate change technologies – would they not also been deemed appropriate to alleviate the food crisis where there are cases of agricultural products inaccessible to farmers due to patents? Sorry – no answers for now but I hope to be able to update this post with some informed comment….
CAS-IP Photos on Flickr
- something went wrong 1 year ago
- Making Research Data Publicly Available and Routes to Open Access dlvr.it/MNX0Fp 1 year ago
- ABS access & benefit sharing africa AGM agriculture attribution branding case case study CBD CGIAR China CIMMYT coffee copyright counterfeiting database datasharing defensive publication development digitisation enforcement Enola EPO ethics Ethiopia expert comment fair use food crisis food security funding/donor genetic resources google books India Indonesia infringement innovation IP landscape Kenya knowledge licences licenses market development NPI open access open source partnerships patent patents piracy plagiarism policy ppp prior art privacy private sector public domain publicly funded research PVP research resource seed seeds social media system dynamics Tanzania tech transfer the international treaty trademark trademarks traditional knowledge TRIPS USAID USPTO WIPO