In an article about the Peer-to-Patent programme“too many lawyers and not enough inventors” was one of the criticisms of the current US patent system (dailyherald.com story link above). Unfortunately, and jokes aside, that’s not the only criticism. An overwhelmed system, backlogs of applications as well as changes in pace of technology are some of the reasons contributing to an increase in poor quality patents. And poor quality patents means more time spent in infringement litigation, which nobody wants (apart from the lawyers perhaps!). The article outlines some of the opinions for and against the Peer-to-Patent programme, and some of the history and reasoning that lead to its launch. It could spell an important change in the way patents are issued, and more importantly to the CGIAR, how prior art is identified.
CAS-IP Photos on Flickr
- something went wrong 1 year ago
- Making Research Data Publicly Available and Routes to Open Access dlvr.it/MNX0Fp 1 year ago
- ABS access & benefit sharing africa AGM agriculture attribution branding case case study CBD CGIAR China CIMMYT coffee copyright counterfeiting database datasharing defensive publication development digitisation enforcement Enola EPO ethics Ethiopia expert comment fair use food crisis food security funding/donor genetic resources google books India Indonesia infringement innovation IP landscape Kenya knowledge licences licenses market development NPI open access open source partnerships patent patents piracy plagiarism policy ppp prior art privacy private sector public domain publicly funded research PVP research resource seed seeds social media system dynamics Tanzania tech transfer the international treaty trademark trademarks traditional knowledge TRIPS USAID USPTO WIPO