Tag Archives: peer-to-patent

Peer-to-patent project. Closed, or just on hold?

http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/peer-patent-closes-shop
and
http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/policy/showArticle.jhtml?
articleID=218401497

There have been varying reports about the peer-to-patent project these past weeks.  See the two lead links for some background.  The CAS-IP blog has also made a number of posts in the past about peer-to-patent.

IP Kat published a post at the weekend which included a quote explaining it was all a big misunderstanding, and it is simply the end of a pilot phase to allow for evaluation. The Peer to Patent site itself  in fact does back this up, stating (albeit rather curtly):

“The USPTO has closed the Peer-to-Patent pilot and is no longer accepting new applications.”

Peer-to-patent is no stranger to differing opinions.  One of the more outspoken write ups questioning the project was in the Internet Patent News Service, PATNEWS. (This is available as email only, visit http://www.patenting-art.com/clients/patnews.htm to subscribe.) PATNEWS summed up by saying:

“there is only one solution to the PTO’s prior art problem: providing examiners with the tools and resources they need to do the job on their own”

The next USPTO Director & the Peer-to-Patent experiment

http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/06/president-obama-to-nominate-david-kappos-as-uspto-director.html
Obama has chosen Patent Attorney David Kappos to be the next Undersecretary Of Commerce For Intellectual Property And Director Of The U.S. Patent And Trademark Office (USPTO).  Here is an article related to a US-National Public Radio interview with Kappos (http://cairns.typepad.com/peertopatent/2007/08/david-kappos-on.html) that gives a good introduction as to why we should be excited. 

Kappos has been heavily involved in the innovative Peer-to-Patent experiment which seeks to ensure that patent rights are only awarded to novel inventions. 

Of course, the down side is that IBM (where Kappos is coming from) is rather a 900-pound gorilla in the patent area and sometimes speaks out of both sides of its mouth –enjoying huge benefits from licensing its products and protecting its rights aggressively, while pointing fingers at big Pharma for putting in patent applications on anything that moves/did move at-one-time. 

However, I think this appointment bodes well for getting someone into the office of the Director that knows the field and brings a fresh perspective to the USPTO.  I hope he can also rally the Examiner Corps.  The blogs are full of tales of how demoralized US Patent examiners seems to be after years of having to do their job under difficult circumstances and with little apparent support from their administrations.

Post written by Victoria Henson-Apollonio, Manager of CAS-IP